Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
An accelerated misconduct hearing was held on Wednesday 5 August for Inspector Andrew Price at Police Headquarters.
Inspector Price was found to have breached the following standards of professional behaviour:
1. Honesty and Integrity (Integrity Only)
2. Discreditable Conduct
3. Orders and Instructions
It was found the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour when he pleaded guilty on 26 May at Nottingham Magistrates Court to being in possession of Pava spray, contrary to the Firearms Act 1968. The officer’s Pava was found in the boot of his car; when not being carried it must be stored securely in a police station.
It was also found the officer breached the standards of professional behaviour when he had, over an extensive period, continued contact with person A, a vulnerable member of the public. It was found that the initial engagement with Person A was on the basis of his formal duties. However, over time he failed to maintain professional boundaries by meeting person A outside of his duties and his actions could have a serious impact on the public’s confidence in the police service.
The hearing heard the officer met Person A as a result of his duties when he tried to provide support and arrange housing. The officer crossed expected boundaries when he went onto buy person A food or shopping, went to a quiz and when the officer paid off a drug debt. In addition, he advised person A not to report a crime to police and took no action in reporting the matter himself.
The chair of the hearing, Chief Constable Gibson, found the breaches proven and that the conduct amounted to gross misconduct.
The outcome of the hearing was that Inspector Andrew Price was dismissed without notice.
The hearing report will be added when it is available.